Urbin Report

Wednesday, April 02, 2008

Chelsea takes after her mom

The rotten apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Mr. Reynolds points out how she is telling deliberate lies (or she is woefully ignorant, which isn't a good sign either) while pushing her mother's desperate, party wreaking, run for the Presidency.
The daughter of Monica Lewinski's boyfriend's wife is either displaying typical liberal ignorance or is deliberately lying to the American people (well, she is a Clinton) about President George W. Bush and the economic blackmail plan known as the Kyoto Protocols.

"I think the world will breathe a sigh of relief when this president is gone," Clinton said, criticizing Bush for pulling out of various accordings, including the Kyoto Protocol on global warming.

The actual truth of the matter is, of course, something else entirely.
On July 25, 1997, before the Kyoto Protocol was finalized (although it had been fully negotiated, and a penultimate draft was finished), the U.S. Senate unanimously passed by a 95–0 vote the Byrd-Hagel Resolution (S. Res. 98),[63][64] which stated the sense of the Senate was that the United States should not be a signatory to any protocol that did not include binding targets and timetables for developing as well as industrialized nations or "would result in serious harm to the economy of the United States". On November 12, 1998, Vice President Al Gore symbolically signed the protocol. Both Gore and Senator Joseph Lieberman indicated that the protocol would not be acted upon in the Senate until there was participation by the developing nations.[65] The Clinton Administration never submitted the protocol to the Senate for ratification.


So, the reality that Chelsea Clinton is either ignorant of or is deliberately lying about is that her own father deep sixed the Koyto Protocols by never sending to the Senate, where every single liberal democrat was on the record saying they would not vote for it.